The 2015 Sazerac 18 years review

Sazerac 18 Years Review

The 2015 Sazerac 18 years is the last year of the tanked Sazerac – next year will be fresh Buffalo Trace juice. If you’re not familiar with the story of Sazerac 18, and thus don’t know what in the Sam Hill I’m talking about, allow me to fill you in. Back in 2005 Sazerac 18 was given the award of American Whisky of the Year by Whisky Advocate (then Malt Advocate). Buffalo Trace didn’t want to risk the remaining stocks of whiskey becoming over-oaked so they dumped all the barrels of 18+ year old Sazerac they had into a giant 13,500 gallon steel tank to halt the maturation process and the 2006 Sazerac 18 was the first steel tanked release.

In 2008 they moved the whiskey into 3 smaller tanks (2,100 gallons each) and have been pulling the whiskey each year from these tanks. Buffalo Trace also did this with the old Hirsch 16 & 20 year old whiskeys (original Michter’s Distillery) and it seems to becoming an increasingly popular method to arrest the aging process of older whiskeys. Wild Turkey did the same thing with their Russell’s Reserve 1998, Heaven Hill did it with their John E. Fitzgerald Special Reserve and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Diageo was doing the same with some of their future Orphan Barrel releases.

2015 Sazerac 18 years Info

Region: Kentucky, USA

Distiller: Buffalo Trace
Mashbill: Rye mash
Cask: New Charred Oak
Age: 18 years
ABV: 45%

Batch: 2015 (technically 2006)

Price: $80 (MSRP)

2015 Sazerac 18 years Review

Maple Syrup

A nice pop of rye followed by butterscotch, baking spice, vanilla taffy, citrus and just a touch of dill. It’s a decent aroma all around and it was pleasant enough while sitting and sniffing it on the patio of Everyone Royce bar.

Butterscotch, wood, rye spice, a buttery sweetness, a touch of fruit and an earthy, almost herbal, undertone. Again it was decent and was perfectly enjoyable to sit and sip, but it wasn’t anything particularly special either.

A med-long fade fueled by rye, wood, dark sweets and a bit of fruit.

Moderate balance, medium body and a smooth approachable texture – no real heat to speak of.

The 2015 Sazerac 18 Years is a decent, average, rye whiskey. It’s not something I’d balk at if given a glass, but still not something I’m interested in paying $80 for let alone the absurd secondary prices. If I’m being totally honest I like the regular Sazerac Rye more because it’s more lively, expressive and balanced. There is a harmony in the Baby Saz that I’m missing here.

Since this was done at a tasting I thought I’d add that some of the folks at the table thought pretty much the same thing about this whiskey while others thought it was a bit better than I was giving it credit for. Although no one at our table thought that it was amazing or even ranked it in the top 3 of the night and we did the entire BTAC line, Four Roses LE, Elijah 18 and Parker’s Heritage Malt whiskey. Tasting is personal, and opinions vary, so take that info for what it’s worth.

I should also point out that the “Baby Saz” is also a different mashbill, but in 2016 they’ll be the same since the 2015 Sazerac 18 is the last year of the Saz 18 that was steel tanked in 2006.

SCORE: 83-86/100 (consumed at a tasting, not at home)

2015 Sazerac 18 Years Review - Score Breakdown
  • Nose - 83
  • Palate - 83
  • Finish - 83
  • Balance, Body & Feel - 83


The 2015 Sazerac 18 Years is an ok whiskey that I’d feel much more at home with paying about $20 less than MSRP for. It’s not a bad whiskey by any means, but it does feel overpriced for what you get in my opinion. I’d rather save $40 and just drink the 6 year old baby Saz.

Sazerac 18 Years Label

Josh Peters

Josh Peters

I read about, think about, write about, and drink whisk(e)y. In short, it's my passion.
Josh Peters

Latest posts by Josh Peters (see all)

Filed Under: Rye

2 Responses to The 2015 Sazerac 18 years review

  1. This was the rye that converted me from being just a bourbon guy to a bourbon & rye guy. This was about a year or two after I first got into whiskey, when my palate still favored smoothness over character. However, tonight for the first time I tried this and baby Saz back to back, and I’ve gotta say, you’re right- the baby Saz is way better than Saz 18. If anyone ever needed to back up the argument that age is just a number for whiskey, baby Saz vs. Saz 18 would definitely be the way to do it.

Leave a reply

Send this to a friend